|
|
|
|
MAGAZINE EDITION Chris Johnstone Intro.M.E. - A Memoir Peter Davies on Whinging The Commercial Imperative Assassin The Commercial Imperative Alternative Ordinary Angel Support Groups And New York, New York Reviews Peter Murchie Goes Festive Josie Inwood Pigs out at the EIFF John Rankin doesn't go to Court Blair Smith is Text Happy An inch, an inch... From The College For The Noticeboard CONTRIBUTORS Chris JohnstoneCampbell Murdoch Alex Thain niahT xelA Ali Bodie Trevor Thompson Suhayl Saadi Peter Murchie Josie Inwood John Rankin Blair H Smith Paul Costello About The Contributors RCGP Bookstore BACK ISSUES hoolet 51-Spring 2007hoolet 50-Winter 2006 hoolet 49-Summer 2006 hoolet 48-Spring 2006 hoolet 47-Winter 2005 hoolet 46-Autumn 2005 hool8 45-Summer 2005 hoolet 44-Spring 2005 hoolet 43-Winter 2004 hoolet 42-Autumn 2004 hoolet 41-Summer 2004 hoolet 40-Spring 2004 hoolet 39-Winter 2003 hoolet 38-Autumn 2003 hoolet 37-Summer 2003 hoolet 36-Spring 2003 hoolet 35-Winter 2002 hoolet 34-Autumn 2002 hoolet 33-Spring 2002 hoolet 32-Winter 2001 hoolet 31-Autumn 2001 hoolet 30-Summer 2001 hoolet 29-Spring 2001 hoolet 28-Winter 2000 hoolet 27-Autumn 2000 hoolet 26-Summer 2000 hoolet 25-Spring 2000 hoolet 24-Winter 1999 CONTACTS contact detailsWEB LINKS COURSES |
![]() COURTING DISASTERBy John Rankin Well, today (Thursday), I spent five minutes in the witness box in the High Court in Edinburgh. The first two were spent telling the jury my full name, my qualifications, my length of experience as a Police Surgeon (16 years) and that my normal occupation was as a general practitioner. I was then told that the prosecution and defence counsels (all three) were agreed that I had examined the accused on the specified date, and that I had noted “extensive bruising and swelling of the dorsum of the left foot.” I was asked by the Advocate Depute that if the injury had been caused by kicking, what sort of force would be required to cause such swelling and bruising, and the only word I could think of was “significant.” I was then asked whether the type of shoe worn might have a bearing on the type of injury, and was asked to look at production X. Unfortunately, production X was in a sealed brown paper bag with no viewing window, and it could not be opened because it did not have a decontamination certificate! I was asked to accept that the bag contained a pair of trainers, and whether that knowledge would alter my opinion. After replying “No”, I was politely thanked for my evidence. In turn, each of the three defence counsels then intimated that they had no questions for me in cross-examination, and I was excused by M'Lord. As this was the third time the trial had been called, (no explanations given for the two previous postponements), I suppose I was lucky - two policemen in the witness room had been sitting waiting daily since Monday, and had still not given their evidence. What exactly my tour-de-force on the stand contributed to the justice procedure, I do not know, as it appeared obvious that such evidence as I had to give could have been agreed in advance of the trial. Unfortunately, this example is all too typical of the shambles which currently passes for the Scottish Criminal Justice System. Constant delay, repeated postponement, little, if any, precognition to establish what may or may not be uncontested evidence - these are the norm for those of us helping the police with forensic work. Two years ago, a number of us - police, public and medical witnesses - were left in the witness room in the High Court in Edinburgh, because no-one had informed us that the sitting had finished for the day forty minutes earlier! My subsequent tirade letter to the Herald resulted in the ultimate accolade - an appearance on the Lesley Riddoch show on Radio Scotland! Unfortunately, despite assurances by lawyers who were also on the programme that the inquiry and review by Lord Bonomy would sort out the problems in the administration of justice, little has happened to improve the system. Since that time, I have received nearly one hundred citations, but have appeared in court on only three occasions. More often than not, I have to phone an increasingly overworked and harassed Procurator Fiscal service to point out that while my name might appear on the witness sheet, my involvement was purely to take a blood sample and that this is invariably agreed evidence. Police work for GPs is an interesting and well-remunerated job which can be carried out in conjunction with general practice. Court appearances are infrequent in practice, and it can be quite entertaining to cross swords with a defence counsel who persists with a “Is it possible, doctor?…..” line of questioning - (anything is possible!). The problem which must be sorted out is the uncertainty relating to when and if you must appear in court, and this can only be done by proper precognition and discussion about what evidence is significant and relevant to the case by prosecution and defence. This applies even more to the police who do not have the ability, as I do, to say that I will not come to court until I am guaranteed a time to be taken, so that a locum can be arranged. The Advocate Deputes are usually very accommodating to this stance, realizing that patient care would be compromised if this were not so. Today's little jaunt has cost you, the taxpayer, a rail ticket to Edinburgh and a morning's locum fee. I am sure you will all be happy to have contributed to the cause of justice. P.S. if anyone is interested in a job, just pop in to your local constabulary!
Other hoolet online articles by John Rankin can be found at:
hoolet is the magazine of RCGP Scotland. It is supported intellectually, financially and emotionally by RCGP Scotland. |
|