|
|
|
|
MAGAZINE EDITION Chris Johnstone Intro.Amazon Adventure No Jams Tomorrow Three Theories Pharmacopœe Forteana May The Best Team Win Zeitgeist The Supporter And The Winner Is... A Different Holy Aisle Letter To The Editor CONTRIBUTORS Chris JohnstonePam Cairns Peter Cawston Peter Davies Blair Smith Hamish McLaren Alex Thain Peter Murchie Ali Bodie Gail Addis About The Contributors RCGP Bookstore BACK ISSUES hoolet 51-Spring 2007hoolet 50-Winter 2006 hoolet 49-Summer 2006 hoolet 48-Spring 2006 hoolet 47-Winter 2005 hoolet 46-Autumn 2005 hool8 45-Summer 2005 hoolet 44-Spring 2005 hoolet 43-Winter 2004 hoolet 42-Autumn 2004 hoolet 41-Summer 2004 hoolet 40-Spring 2004 hoolet 39-Winter 2003 hoolet 38-Autumn 2003 hoolet 37-Summer 2003 hoolet 36-Spring 2003 hoolet 35-Winter 2002 hoolet 34-Autumn 2002 hoolet 33-Spring 2002 hoolet 32-Winter 2001 hoolet 31-Autumn 2001 hoolet 30-Summer 2001 hoolet 29-Spring 2001 hoolet 28-Winter 2000 hoolet 27-Autumn 2000 hoolet 26-Summer 2000 hoolet 25-Spring 2000 hoolet 24-Winter 1999 CONTACTS contact detailsWEB LINKS COURSES |
![]() NO JAMS TOMORROWOn the 26th March 2006 smoking in enclosed public spaces in Scotland became illegal. The global nicotine industry has too long taken shelter behind the smokescreen of freedom for the consumer. We should rightly be proud that in Scotland the defence of health has prevailed over the interests of big business. The Scottish Parliament and Executive deserve all due credit for making this happen. During the last fifty years the medical profession has also led the way, by personal example (only a small proportion of doctors smoke), by research and by lobbying. Doctors have made full use of their social position to help make this decision politically possible. Soon after the smoking ban took effect another important battle for Scotland's health will be fought. This time however there are no high impact television commercials drawing attention to the event. The Scottish Executive will argue, in court, that it is in our interest to spend between five and eight hundred million pounds on building five miles of motorway. The argument, interestingly, is that it cannot limit our consumer freedom to choose to travel by car. Massive investment must therefore be made to facilitate the exponential growth in car travel. The reason this will take place in court is that the Executive has decided to ignore the findings of an Independent Inquiry and will press ahead with the long planned M74 extension in Glasgow despite clear recommendations to the contrary. Were it not for legal proceedings by Friends of the Earth Scotland and JAM74 arguing that it has not acted properly in so doing, the bulldozers would already be demolishing a swathe through the East End. The cost to public funds would be greater than that of the Scottish Parliament building. While the lure of empty highways seems economically attractive in the short term, the evidence is that traffic circulation through city arteries soon becomes thrombosed no matter how wide the stent. Look no further than the M25! The impact of this decision on the public health should deeply concern us as doctors. Two things have become clear after the recent Montreal conference. Firstly, there is a global scientific consensus that the single greatest long term threat to human health is not tobacco smoke but greenhouse gases. Secondly, this consensus is not reflected among the political classes who prefer political to scientific realities. The conclusions of the Independent Reporters1 on the long term impact of the M74 extension have been similarly discounted by the political process in Scotland. This is alarming in its disregard not only of health but of social justice. For example, the effect of this road will be to release CO2 to the tune of 134,800 extra tonnes annually by 2020, not unlike a huge cigar through the heart of the city. Similarly those living along the route (i.e. Glasgow's most deprived communities) will suffer from the most adverse environmental impacts, with little benefit, while the main advantages of the new road will accrue to non-resident vehicle users. We are at a decision point. This battle will help to define the Scottish policy position towards our seemingly bottomless addiction to fossil fuels. Fine sounding environmental statements have as little impact as warning labels on cigarette packages. What we need are substantive policy decisions. Imagine the effect, not only on air pollution but on accidents, obesity and exercise levels, were half a billion pounds diverted from building this short stretch of motorway to creating a healthier environment for Glasgow's citizens through investment in public transport, cycle paths, traffic free zones and safe roads. Yesterday it was nicotine, now it is oil that threatens our health. As doctors we need to take as firm a stand. 1; The full findings and recommendations of the Independent Reporters can be accessed at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/transport/m74r-00.asp Competing interests: I am a member of Friends of the Earth Scotland
Other online articles by Peter Cawston can be found at:
hoolet is the magazine of RCGP Scotland. It is supported intellectually, financially and emotionally by RCGP Scotland. |
|